...that is the question.
I think I know the answer to the first, but it raises another issue:
i) public transport is presumably low-carbon, not no-carbon. However, this raises a wider issue - offsetting. I think it would be justifiable for those who use public transport and cars to claim birds as zero-carbon finds if they offset their emissions (and can prove it). Thoughts please.
ii) if I visit relatives in Bedford, who live a few hundred yards from Fenlake Meadows, and I walk to the site from my relatives' house, is this zero-carbon? Would I need to get to Bedford by zero-carbon means, or just from my relatives (if I stayed overnight, for example)? Thoughts please.
Atb,
D
Doing the daily and necessary car commute using the minimum carbon route and an osprey flies over me, has happened. Zero additional carbon
ReplyDeleteDoing the daily and necessary car commute using the minimum carbon route and an osprey flies over me, has happened. Zero additional carbon
ReplyDeleteOh come on guys! Zero is Zero, that means if you see the bird from your house/on your land. Or make your way from said abode by foot or any other self operated vehicle. To me, there is no grey area here.
ReplyDeleteOff-setting could get complicated D, is there truly a way of off-setting carbon? Once the carbon has been expelled, surely that's it or
am I being a bit too strict?
Agree with Matt - zero should mean zero. Which basically means anything you have seen using no carbon originating your house. Off-setting WAY too complicated!
DeleteI agree with Matt and Steve, my point re osprey was that anything else makes the idea of zero carbon too silly to be workable
ReplyDeleteCous Cous. That's all I've got to say. Oh and don't see too much, I'm just starting to catch up.
ReplyDelete